Possible HG?

Post Reply
hieraaetus
Posts:104
Joined:Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:53 am
Possible HG?

Post by hieraaetus » Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:46 pm

Hi Guys,

I have come across this smallish, quite pale bird which was strange for me from the very beginning. I would like to hear your opinion whether this could be a HG (maybe argenteus??) or not.
Pictures were taken on 2011.10.19. in Debrecen, Hungary.

Thanks in advance.

Best wishes,

Gabor
Attachments
Arg_20111019.jpg
Arg_20111019.jpg (219.81KiB)Viewed 6993 times
Arg_20111019_1200.jpg
Arg_20111019_1200.jpg (262.36KiB)Viewed 6993 times

Ronald Klein
Posts:88
Joined:Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by Ronald Klein » Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:48 am

It looks indeed quite good for a 2nd cy HG. Note that in German and Polish inland HG breeds too, often in hybridisation.
Some HG from Baltic also migrate to the Adriatic Gulf in autumn/winter.
What about the yellow colour-ring on the 2nd cy YLG in foreground? From Croatia?
Interesting for me - I see only a single Caspian Gull at image 2.

hieraaetus
Posts:104
Joined:Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:53 am

Re: Possible HG?

Post by hieraaetus » Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:14 pm

Ronald Klein wrote:It looks indeed quite good for a 2nd cy HG. Note that in German and Polish inland HG breeds too, often in hybridisation.
Some HG from Baltic also migrate to the Adriatic Gulf in autumn/winter.
What about the yellow colour-ring on the 2nd cy YLG in foreground? From Croatia?
Interesting for me - I see only a single Caspian Gull at image 2.

Hi Ronald,

Thanks for your reply.
We get the nominate 'argentatus' in low numbers during migration and in the winter here in Hungary but I don't think we have a case of the 'argenteus' form (and this one reminds me of a 2cy argenteus)..
Regarding the YLG, yes it is from Croatia and it was photographed about 2 weeks ago too.
At around this time of the year the number of CGs are quite low at my local spot (my latest estimation was between 10-20%) but keeps building up as the winter approaches.
I'm just curious which bird you think to be the CG? I might be wrong but to my eyes these are all YLGs. I also took pictures of CGs as wll of course.

Best wishes,

Gabor

Ronald Klein
Posts:88
Joined:Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by Ronald Klein » Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:40 pm

In my opinion, a clear identification of "argenteus" in field is impossible because there are clinal variation to argentatus. May be someone can correct me.
The young bird with closed eyes in left part seems to be a cachinnans.

adriaens
Posts:229
Joined:Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by adriaens » Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:57 pm

Ronald Klein wrote: The young bird with closed eyes in left part seems to be a cachinnans.
Are you really sure about this, Ronald ? The central greater coverts are just visible, and they show rather thick, parallel brown bars as in Yellow-legged Gull.
Also, bill shape and head shape look better for YLG.

hieraaetus
Posts:104
Joined:Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:53 am

Re: Possible HG?

Post by hieraaetus » Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:09 pm

Ronald Klein wrote:In my opinion, a clear identification of "argenteus" in field is impossible because there are clinal variation to argentatus. May be someone can correct me.
The young bird with closed eyes in left part seems to be a cachinnans.
Hi Ronald,

I have tried to find a better picture of that particular gull but there is none. However I found another one of my gull showing the rear end:) unfortunately without the tail...

Cheers,

Gabor
Attachments
Arg_20111019_II.jpg
Arg_20111019_II.jpg (232.16KiB)Viewed 6966 times

Ronald Klein
Posts:88
Joined:Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by Ronald Klein » Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:19 am

adriaens wrote:
Ronald Klein wrote: The young bird with closed eyes in left part seems to be a cachinnans.
Are you really sure about this, Ronald ? The central greater coverts are just visible, and they show rather thick, parallel brown bars as in Yellow-legged Gull.
Also, bill shape and head shape look better for YLG.
No, I am not sure on the basis of this single photo. But bill + headshape is also good for a strong cach-male and I miss the mich-typical dark eye-mask. The covert-pattern is not typical, but possible. Tertials looks indeed mich-like, but how worn they are?
Last not least: There are a lot of f... hybrids (mostly cach x arg) in the new colonized Central Europe.

User avatar
JanJ
Posts:437
Joined:Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:08 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by JanJ » Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:02 am

Sorry to hijack this thread but i can´t seem to get my head around this gull from Sweden the other day (taken by Mikael Nord).
Imo there´s both argentatus & michahellis in this gull. Inner primary pattern seems in many ways better for argentatus, however, ther may be some michahellis that are quite similar in this respcet. Some people might suggest argentatus without hesitation, som a hybrid of some sort. I´m certain you guys would notice the features of this gull.
There are some more pic here:

http://www.praktejder.se/news.php?lang= ... 07&lista=Y

Jan
Attachments
347194.jpg
argentatus/michahellis? 2011.10.19 (Mikael Nord)
347194.jpg (83.57KiB)Viewed 6949 times
347195.jpg
argentatus/michahellis? 2011.11.19 (Mikael Nord
347195.jpg (59.14KiB)Viewed 6949 times

adriaens
Posts:229
Joined:Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by adriaens » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:29 pm

@ Ronald: Some 1st-cycle YLGulls lack the dark eye-mask. A few examples here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1156597924 ... ll1stCycle#

@JanJ:
I would identify this bird as a Herring Gull.

User avatar
JanJ
Posts:437
Joined:Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:08 pm

Re: Possible HG?

Post by JanJ » Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:17 pm

adriaens wrote:@ Ronald: Some 1st-cycle YLGulls lack the dark eye-mask. A few examples here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1156597924 ... ll1stCycle#

@JanJ:
I would identify this bird as a Herring Gull.
Thanks for that Peter. I got stuck, however, with an initial impression of a somewhat quite clear argentatus I should say.

As Peter say´s - a first cycle michahellis at this time of year can def. lack dark (ish) eye-mask/ear-coverts. However, it´s also in some cases a photographic effect, meaning - what would seeme like a mask in one pic - is lost in another.

Jan

Post Reply