Post
by marsmuusse » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:11 pm
I think it will be best to leave this bird labelled ‘heuglini’, until we know more about the variation in this taxon. I see graellsii LBBG quite often, but the combination of features presented by this individual are striking. Furthermore, the location favour heuglini over graellsii as well?
But, I don’t agree the underwing is ‘all white unmarked’ as there are obvious markings on the under-wing primary coverts. And I hesitate to call the moult in the inner primaries ‘advanced’. The only slightly odd aspect is that P1 on the right wing seems to have an obvious broader white tip than P2, in all pictures, which just might indicate it is of another generation or moulted later than P2, but I doubt that.
The third picture where the bird raises the wings show a brown hue on the outer-webs of P1-P4 and the step to P5 look logic in colour and pattern. The conditions of the tips of P1-P10 are similar for all feathers in the left wing, without a moult division.
As Ruud mentioned, the mirror on P10 is striking for this plumage; typically a pattern associated with late moult in the winter (say mid-January as seen in winter images of fuscus and heuglini) and the idea is that birds moulting this late, have different hormone-levels which may result in more ‘adult-like’ feathers.
In my local area, IJmuiden – the Netherlands, I see adult Herring Gulls struggling again with their hormones in January, when the sun melts the snow on the first warm day of the year…
The problem / challenge of course is: can we safely rule out a 4cy bird? Would the outer secondaries eliminate this option?